Wednesday, March 6, 2013

On This Day in History -Another Dark Story

You know, we Americans have a tendency to put a great deal of faith in our Supreme Court. We turn to it in the hope of settling many issues that our Congress has failed to resolve for us. This has always been true from the very founding of the country. Unfortunately for us, we forget that the Justices are just human and subject to the same biases and prejudices that afflict the rest of us and that they are appointed and confirmed in office through a heavily political process. While we have been lucky to have had some truly great Justices on the court over the years, we have also managed to have some real losers. A decision handed down by the Supreme Court on this day in 1857 is evidence of that.

On this day in 1857, the United States Supreme Court issued a decision in the Dred Scott case, affirming the right of slave owners to take their slaves into the Western territories, thereby negating the doctrine of popular sovereignty and severely undermining the platform of the newly created Republican Party.

At the heart of the case was the most important question of the 1850s: Should slavery be allowed in the West? As part of the Compromise of 1850, residents of newly created territories could decide the issue of slavery by vote, a process known as popular sovereignty. When popular sovereignty was applied in Kansas in 1854, however, violence erupted. Americans hoped that the Supreme Court could settle the issue that had eluded a congressional solution.

Dred Scott was a slave whose owner, an army doctor, had spent time in Illinois, a free state, and Wisconsin, a free territory at the time of Scott's residence. The Supreme Court was stacked in favor of the slave states. Five of the nine justices were from the South while another, Robert Grier of Pennsylvania, was staunchly pro-slavery. Chief Justice Roger B. Taney wrote the majority decision, which was issued on March 6, 1857. The court held that Scott was not free based on his residence in either Illinois or Wisconsin because he was not considered a person under the U.S. Constitution--in the opinion of the justices, black people were not considered citizens when the Constitution was drafted in 1787. According to Taney, Dred Scott was the property of his owner, and property could not be taken from a person without due process of law.

In fact, there were free black citizens of the United States in 1787, but Taney and the other justices were attempting to halt further debate on the issue of slavery in the territories (today we call that legislating from the bench). Instead of solving the problem, the decision inflamed regional tensions, which burned for another four years before exploding into the Civil War.

Live Long and Prosper...

No comments: